Kalkhoff vs Cube: comfort or sportiness for commuting?
Last week, I was standing with a friend in front of the bicycle parking lot at the Driebergen-Zeist train station. He was looking at two electric bikes as if they were candidates for a job interview. On the left, a Kalkhoff. On the right, a Cube.
"What matters most to me is that it simply works," he said. "But I also don't want to feel like I'm riding a scooter for seniors. It can be a bit sporty."
This is exactly where this comparison becomes interesting. Kalkhoff and Cube both know how to make very good electric bikes, but they start from different perspectives. Kalkhoff thinks first and foremost in terms of comfort and everyday practicality. Cube comes from a more sporty background and extends this philosophy to its trekking and commuter models.
Written by: Jos Mans | January 22, 2025 | Reading time: 5minutes
About the author: Jos Mans
Jos is a writer and cyclist, most often both at the same time. With thousands of miles under his belt and just as many words on paper, he combines his two great passions: being on the move and telling stories.
Key findings
- Kalkhoff generally offers a calmer and more comfortable ride: ideal for commuting, city riding, and leisurely rides.
- Cube is often more dynamic and sportier: more enjoyable if pace and precise steering are important to you.
- The best choice rarely depends on the logo on the frame, but rather on how you will use it: distance, type of road, riding position, and amount of gear you carry.
The difference in character: comfort vs. "active cycling"
I'll put it simply, as I see it: Kalkhoff is often the bike that thinks with you. Cube is more often the one that challenges you. Not always, not on every model, but broadly speaking, that's how I perceive them.
For decades, Kalkhoff has been building bikes in a pragmatic German style: solid, logical, designed for journeys you make week after week. Think of models such as the Endeavour (trekking/commuting), the Image (urban comfort) or the Entice (all-road). The handling is stable and the riding position generally more relaxed.
Cube comes from a world where bikes are also sports equipment. As a result, many Cube e-bikes offer a more direct feel, with a stiffer frame and sharper steering. This is particularly noticeable on trekking models such as the Kathmandu Hybrid and Touring Hybrid. And when it comes to e-MTBs, there are models such as the Stereo Hybrid.
Who is Kalkhoff for (and who is it not for)?
A few years ago, I was riding a trendy brand with a beautiful design and promising features. After a year and a half of commuting to work, minor annoyances began to accumulate: noise, minor breakdowns, details that were never quite right. I switched to a Kalkhoff Endeavour, and my doubts disappeared.
Where Kalkhoff excels
- Comfort and peace of mind: longer journeys without shoulder tension.
- Stability with loads: panniers, child seat, computer, groceries... the bike remains predictable.
- Daily use: many models are designed as "ready-to-use" bikes, with all the necessary equipment.
Where Kalkhoff may disappoint
- If you're looking for a fun bike. Some Kalkhoff bikes are sturdy but not very responsive.
- If you are very sensitive to weight or the feeling of inertia. Comfort and sturdiness may seem heavy.
- If you also buy a bike for its looks, Kalkhoff rarely sparks admiring conversations.
Who is Cube designed for (and who is it not designed for)?
Cube is ideal for cyclists who want to retain a real cycling feel, even with electric assistance: you pedal, you steer, you feel the road. The motor helps, period. In trekking ranges such as Kathmandu or Touring, this results in bikes that are both practical and sporty, which you almost want to keep riding even when the battery is empty.
Where Cube excels
- Precise steering: more responsive, "engaged" handling, inherited from MTB and road bikes.
- Wide selection: from commuting to weekend rides, to serious e-MTBs.
- Good value for money: often very good specifications depending on the version.
Where Cube may disappoint
- If comfort and a very upright position are your top priorities, some Cubes may seem unnecessarily firm.
- If you let yourself be seduced too quickly by the look. A sporty position can become tiring after 30 minutes.
- There is a wide range of products available, so it is important to know what you are buying.
How to make the right choice in 10 minutes (without regrets)
Set your driving position
- You want a relaxed, upright position with a good overview → Kalkhoff.
- You prefer a more active position, with a little more weight on your hands and the front wheel → Cube.
Analyze your career path
- City, frequent stops, speed bumps, traffic → Kalkhoff.
- Fast stretches outside built-up areas, steady pace, long straights → Cube.
Tips for the test
- Take a sharp turn.
- Drives over a bad road surface.
- Brake hard once.
In general, you'll quickly get a feel for what suits your riding style and main terrain. Also consider practical aspects such as racks, fenders, lights, anti-theft devices, and tires width.
Common errors when comparing
- Focusing solely on the engine. Important, yes, but the feel of the frame determines your enjoyment over many years.
- Neglecting the size of the bike. A poorly sized sports bike feels unpleasantly nervous; a poorly sized comfortable bike feels heavy.
- Forget the equipment. "I'll add the mudguards later." In practice, we often never do.
- Base your decision on a single review. Look for recurring trends: comfort, position, braking, stability.
- Buy on the private market. A certified reseller or platform offers more guarantees and security.
My recommendation
Choose Kalkhoff for peace of mind and ease. Choose Cube for riding pleasure and responsiveness.
For most people who just want to ride their bikes for everyday trips, around town, or weekend outings without any hassle, I would recommend Kalkhoff: less friction, fewer surprises.
But if, on every ride, you secretly want to turn your journey into a mini workout, maintain your pace, and experience a true cycling feel, then Cube is the best choice.
And that friend at Driebergen-Zeist station? He chose the sporty option. So a Cube trekking bike.
FAQ
Which is the best choice for commuting: Kalkhoff or Cube?
For mainly urban use, Kalkhoff often wins out thanks to its comfort and predictability. Cube is very suitable if your route includes long fast sections and you prefer a more active riding position.
Which one is more comfortable over long distances?
Kalkhoff is generally smoother and more relaxing, especially in an upright position. Cube can be comfortable, but with a more engaged posture.
Is Cube too sporty for a "traditional" cyclist?
Sometimes, yes. Not because it's uncomfortable, but because some models make you lean forward more than expected. Great for riding fast, not so great for cruising.
Is Kalkhoff still a bit boring?
No. More functional. If you see your bike as a tool that makes your life easier, it's a real asset. But if you're looking for a lively, fun ride, it may seem too sensible.
What is the most versatile choice if I only want one bike?
For city riding, commuting, and touring with panniers: Kalkhoff is often the most reliable choice. For more dynamic use, with speed, open roads, and sometimes trails: Cube is a better fit.